-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------- X
TIBOR GASPARIK,
Plaintiff,
-against-
STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY
Defendant.
------------------------------------------------------- X
CV-05-03817 (SJF)
DECLARATION
TIBOR GASPARIK, Plaintiff pro se, affirms the following under penalties of perjury:
1. I am Plaintiff pro se in this action, and this affirmation is submitted in opposition to the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56.
2. I am fully familiar with all of the facts and circumstances in this case.
3. It is Plaintiff’s position that the sole reason that the Plaintiff was persecuted and eventually terminated from employment by the Defendant was his political orientation.
4. The annexed exhibits are relevant to and are referenced in the Plaintiff’s Statement of Undisputed Facts and Memorandum of Law submitted in opposition to the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
5. Annexed hereto as
Exhibit “A” is the document titled “Account of my Persecution,” with the selected supporting documentation labeled as (Exhibit) E-1 to E-60.
6. Annexed hereto as
Exhibit “B” is the document titled “Credentials and Accomplishments,” with the selected supporting documentation labeled as (Exhibit) E-61 to E-100.
7. Annexed hereto as
Exhibit “C” is the document titled “E-mails relevant to the teaching position at the Ralph G. Reed Middle School in the Central Islip School District.”
8. Annexed hereto as
Exhibit “D” is the document titled “Discrimination in Academia: End of 2006 Review,” with the selected supporting documentation labeled as (Link) L-1 to L-70.
9. Referenced pages from the transcript of Plaintiff’s
Deposition are annexed to the Defendant’s moving papers.
10. The exhibits listed above are being filed in hard copy and will be maintained in the case file in the Clerk’s Office. The exhibits and complete supporting documentation are also accessible on the Plaintiff’s Web site “Tibor Gasparik - Discrimination in Academia” (
http://suny-stonybrook.blogspot.com/).
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested from this Court that the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied in its entirety.
Dated: Holtsville, New York
January 12, 2007
_____________________________
Tibor Gasparik
Plaintiff pro se, and
Research Associate Professor
352 Plad Blvd
Holtsville, New York 11742
(631) 447-2168
TO: Lori L. Pack
Office of the Attorney General
300 Motor Parkway, Suite 205
Hauppauge, NY 11788